Alexis Canter vs Tyler Mercier Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L L W L
Form
L L W W W L L L W LH2H: Canter 1 - 0 Mercier
They have played 2 sets in total, with Canter winning 2 and Mercier winning 0. The last match between Canter and Mercier was at the Israel F3 (Tel Aviv), 21-03-2018, First, Hard with Alexis Canter getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alexis Canter | 1 |
| Tyler Mercier | 0 |
Israel F3 (Tel Aviv)(21-03-2018)
6
3
6
1
| Canter | Stats | Mercier |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (9-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 25% (1-3) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 886 | Ranking | N/A |
| 773 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 26 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 52% (207-194) | Career Total W/L | 40% (78-119) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Alexis Canter
Player
Tyler Mercier
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:9:0 | Average Match Time | 1:9:0 |
| 77% (33/43) | 1st Serve % | 77% (47/61) |
| 76% (25/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (27/47) |
| 80% (8/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (4/14) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (30/61) | Return Points Win % | 23% (10/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alexis Canter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Alexis Canter
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Jonas Pelle Hartenstein
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
59%
(
77 of
131)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
77)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
57 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(1) 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Alexis Canter
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
77%
(
55 of
71)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Alexis Canter
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
89%
(
17 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Daniel Kliebhan
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
51
Total Points Won
55
|
4-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Dylan Davies
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tyler Mercier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mateo Del Pino
Player
Tyler Mercier
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tyler Mercier
Player
Damian Frutos
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tyler Mercier
Player
Tomas Giangrasso
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-7(5) 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 1-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (207/194) | Win/Loss | 40% (78/119) |
| 52% (464/428) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (187/260) |
| 51% (4368/4140) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (1988/2237) |
| 55% (141/117) | Hard Win/Loss | 40% (46/68) |
| 47% (7/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 39% (30/47) |
| 48% (55/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 31% (4/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 773 | Aces Total | 384 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 468 | Total Double Faults | 362 |
| 1:7:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 330.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 370.37 |
| 63% (10871/17284) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4209/6920) |
| 67% (7256/10871) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2794/4209) |
| 49% (3129/6413) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1290/2711) |
| 40% (560/1383) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (191/503) |
| 37% (6120/16584) | Return Points Win % | 34% (2277/6697) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18% (2/9) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 53% (205/185) | Futures W/L | 40% (78/118) |
| 52% (205/398) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (73/191) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 51% (48/94) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (26/47) |
| 44% (41/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (21/55) |
| 86% (215/184) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (81/66) |
| 14% (215/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (81/15) |
| 12% (186/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (116/10) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
